← Favemark

Privacy Policy

Effective 24 September 2026 · version 2026-11-17

Favemark is a photo notebook. You take a photo, an AI reads it and suggests tags, you give it a rating, and later you find it again by tag, date, place, a similar photo, or by asking. Making that work means sending your photos to companies other than us. This page says exactly which ones, exactly what they get, and what we keep.

It describes the app as it is actually built today, not as it is planned. Where something is designed but not built, it says so.

1. What we collect

We do not use third-party analytics, advertising SDKs, crash reporting, or any tracker. There are none in the app. What we do measure is our own and listed above — how long you waited (the performance records), how the assistant is doing (your reactions), and how the shelf reader is doing (the shelf scans) — and all of it goes only to our server.

2. Who else receives your data

Four outside services are involved. Three of them receive your photographs. What each of them does with what it receives is governed by its own policy, linked below; we have no arrangement with them beyond their standard terms for developers.

Anthropic (Claude)

Reads your photos and your text to suggest tags, identify items, search your library, and answer in the assistant and in Help.

What we send them

When

Their policy: https://www.anthropic.com/legal/privacy

Google (Gemini)

Reads your photos to suggest tags, list the products on a shelf you scan, and check whether you've tried something before; and reads short pieces of your text to search your library, fill in tag labels in your language, catalogue a manually added item or a venue, reconcile a suspected duplicate, check a capture's tags against each other, romanize printed text, match a product against the shared index, and name a research chat. Only one company does these jobs at a time: Google, unless we switch them to Anthropic. Straightening a tilted shot is OpenAI's (below); Google does it only if we switch the Level button back. If Google cannot answer, your photo is not passed on to Anthropic instead; but when Google's reader is unavailable for suggesting tags or checking whether you've tried something, OpenAI reads that photo once in its place (below). Google also turns a photo — and some tag labels — into a numeric fingerprint so “find similar” can work, and that job stays with Google even when the others are switched to Anthropic.

What we send them

When

Their policy: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/terms

OpenAI

Reads a photo to straighten it when you tap Level, and reads each new capture once to turn it the right way up if it was taken sideways — automatically, with no tap. It also reads a photo to identify the item and suggest its tags, but only when Google's reader is unavailable (it could not be reached, ran out of time or failed on its side, never because of what it answered): that one read is then asked of OpenAI once, in Google's place. It does nothing else in Favemark. If we switch Level off, the Level button goes back to Google (or to Anthropic, if those jobs are switched there); if we switch the turning off, nobody reads a capture for it; if we switch the backup off, a read Google could not answer fails as it did before. A photo OpenAI cannot read is not passed on to anyone else.

What we send them

When

Their policy: https://openai.com/policies/privacy-policy/

Microsoft (Exchange Online) or Resend

Delivers the handful of transactional emails the app sends: the address-verification message, a password-reset link when one is asked for, a notice when the password is changed or reset, and a notice when we revoke a note link at the request of someone it shows.

What we send them

When

Their policy: https://privacy.microsoft.com/privacystatement

Agreeing to this, and taking it back

The app asks before your first photo is processed. The screen describes the processing — what is sent, why, and that it runs both automatically and when you ask — and points here for the companies currently doing it (see §9 for why it is worded that way). It records which agreement you accepted. You can decline, and you can change your mind later in Settings → Image processing.

Your agreement covers processing, not just uploading. While it is switched off, no photo of yours is sent to any of those companies — not a new capture, and not one already stored on our servers. That includes re-tagging a photo, re-framing it, making a different photo the main one, “find similar”, reading a label shot, looking up the maker's own page for something you rated, and asking the assistant about a note that has a photo. Those last ones matter because they happen after the capture, at a moment of your choosing rather than ours, and until August 2026 several of them ran without consulting your agreement at all. They no longer do.

Two limits, stated plainly. Turning it off does not reach back into anything already sent — see §5. And it does not cover what you type: a question to the assistant from home, from search or on a note with no photo sends text, not an image, so it is not held back, and it goes to Anthropic to answer you whether this is on or off. The assistant can also send the text from your library that the answer needs, and that can include words read from your photos earlier, such as an item's name, tags and notes. A question on a note with a photo is held, as above. Other things you type are sent whether this is on or off too, such as a question to Help.

A note on web search

“Identify this” and the assistant's research answers use a web-search tool that runs inside Anthropic's service. Search terms derived from your photo or your question are sent by Anthropic to its search provider and reach the public web. We do not control or see that onward step beyond the results that come back.

Since 23 August 2026 this can also happen without you asking. If you have agreed to image processing, when you rate something and we cannot identify it from a barcode, the app sends that photo to Anthropic in the background and asks it to find the manufacturer's own page for the item. It is the same company, the same downscaled copy and the same web search as “Identify this” — what is new is that nothing you tapped named the item. The agreement the app asks for covers this: it says plainly that processing runs both automatically and when you ask, with no condition attached. §9 explains when a change would make us ask you again — and why this kind does not.

Fetching a picture from the maker's website

When that lookup finds the manufacturer's page, our server downloads the product photograph published on it and stores it beside your own, kept with its credit. Those websites receive nothing about you. The request is made by our server rather than by your phone, so the site sees our address and the picture we asked for — never your IP address, your account, your photo, or your notes.

They are not listed above with the four named services because they are not a fixed set with a policy we could link: it is whichever page turns out to describe the thing you photographed. If you hold rights in such a picture, §10 says how to have it removed.

The maker's own photo, from our copy of Open Food Facts

Some products' records in Open Food Facts are published by the company that owns the brand, together with the front-of-pack photo that company uploaded. We copy those makers' photos in bulk, ahead of any user and unrelated to anything you do, from Open Food Facts into our own storage, each kept with its uploader's credit and the CC BY-SA 3.0 licence it is published under. When you rate such a product, your note can show that photo, with its credit in the note's details, and nothing about you or your photo is sent anywhere to get it. If a copy is disputed, we remove it for everyone at once.

3. What never goes to an AI model

These are properties of how the app is built, not statements of intention:

4. Where your data is kept

5. How long we keep it, and how to delete it

6. Who can see your library

Only you, and the operator of the service — unless you choose otherwise, in the one way described just below. Every request is checked against your account before anything is read, and another account's photo is indistinguishable from a photo that does not exist.

There are no public profiles and no shared libraries. Nothing of yours is visible to another person by default, and nothing becomes visible as a side effect of anything else. The exceptions are links you create yourself and circles you choose to join, described next; the thing after them is shared with everyone and holds nothing of yours.

A link you can share: an assistant that answers about one category

You can give someone a link to an assistant that answers questions about your rated notes in one category — the wines you have tried, say — without them signing in or installing anything. You create it, it covers one category you pick, and it works for anyone who has the URL until you revoke it; revoking deletes the link and everything stored under it. You create one in the app, under Settings → Shared assistants, where you can also change its note to guests and its date, or revoke it.

What a link discloses

What it never includes

What is kept, and what is not

A guest's questions and the assistant's answers are not stored. The conversation exists only in the guest's browser tab, and each question resends it to be answered. What you see is counts and a last-opened time only: how many times the link was opened and when it was last opened, how many questions were asked, and how many “I'll bring this” claims currently stand (claims, not people — one guest may claim several items). You never see what was asked, what was answered, or which items were claimed.

A guest's question — with the notes the link discloses, your note to guests and any memories the link shares — goes to Anthropic to be answered, under your account: it counts against your daily allowance and is logged in your record of AI calls. It is the same company and the same kind of processing your library already goes through, at a stranger's request; no photo is involved, and the request carries the link's identifier rather than your account's. Creating the link is what allows it — see §9 for why this is disclosed here rather than asked again in the app.

If you give the link an occasion, a guest can say “I'll bring this” about an item the assistant mentioned. That is stored as one row naming you, the link and the note — no text from the guest, no name, no address, no device fingerprint. Other guests are told only that someone may already be bringing that item, never who. The rows are deleted when you change the occasion, revoke the link, or delete your account.

If you are the guest, this is what Favemark holds about you: nothing that names you. Your network address is counted in our server's memory to limit abuse — an hourly count, held in memory until the server restarts or the entry is evicted, and never written to the database, to disk or to a log. If you say you will bring something, the secret that lets you take that back is kept in your own browser, not on our server.

A link to one note

You can share one note by link: open it in the app and tap Share link. Anyone who has the URL sees that note on a web page, without signing in, until you revoke the link; revoking deletes it, and the next visit finds nothing. You can make several links to one note, and revoking one leaves the others working.

What a note link shows

What it never includes

When a link is pasted into a chat, the messaging app may fetch a preview: the note's name and its photo. That fetch is the app reading the page on your recipient's behalf, and a preview it has already fetched stays with that app after you revoke the link.

What you see is a count and a time: how many times each link was opened and when it was last opened. Nothing is recorded about who opened it. A visitor's network address is counted in our server's memory to limit abuse, never written down.

Circles: a group of people you choose

You can make a circle: a small named group of people you choose, who can read each other's rated notes but never change them. Create one in the app under Settings, Sharing, Circles, and invite people with a link that works once and for 7 days. A circle holds at most 12 people, and you can be in at most 5 circles. You need a display name to create or join one, and while you are in a circle you can change it but not remove it.

What members see of each other

What they never see

The person who created a circle also sees each member's email address and the invites still waiting to be used, and is the only one who can invite, remove a member, rename the circle or delete it.

An invite link opens a page on favemark.app that shows the invite and how to open it in the app. The page reads nothing from our records, so it names no circle and no person, and it looks the same whether the invite still works or not.

Any member can leave, and the owner can remove anyone or delete the circle. From then on, people who no longer share a circle cannot read each other's notes; two people who are still in another circle together keep reading each other's notes through that one. Deleting the circle, or deleting your account, removes the circle's records.

One thing that is shared: a product index — and nothing of yours

When the packaging in one of your photos is read clearly enough to be sure what the product is, Favemark records that product's identity — as printed on the pack — in a shared index, and links your note to the entry. It is how the app comes to know a product exists at all: entries are grown by use rather than bought or hand-built, so the next person who photographs the same thing meets it already there.

What it holds

What it never holds

Any signed-in user, through the same authenticated routes as the rest of the app. The entries are about products, not about people: nobody reading one can tell who photographed the thing, or that you did. What an entry does reveal is that someone, at some point, photographed that product — and that is all it can reveal, because nothing in it points back at a person. Your own library is untouched by this; the first paragraph of this section still holds in full.

7. Cookies and device storage

The website sets one cookie, favemark_session, which identifies your signed-in session. It is strictly necessary — without it you cannot stay signed in. There are no analytics or advertising cookies.

The mobile app uses no cookies. Its session token is held in the device's own secure keystore (the iOS Keychain, the Android Keystore), not in ordinary app storage.

A shared assistant page (§6) sets no cookie. The only thing it keeps in a guest's browser is the secret behind an “I'll bring this” they made, so they can take it back; nothing else is stored on their device.

8. Children

Favemark is not directed at children under 13 and we do not knowingly collect their data. If you believe a child has created an account, write to us and we will remove it. A photo can show a child who has no account at all: see §11.

9. Changes to this policy

This page carries a version stamp (2026-11-17). When what we disclose here changes materially — a new company receiving your data, a new category of data leaving our servers — the version moves, so you can always tell which text you were shown.

What you agree to in the app is a category of processing, not a list of companies. The in-app agreement says what leaves (a downscaled copy of what you capture, text you add to it or read from it, an opaque account identifier — and, if you allow location, where you captured something, for place features), why (to tag, identify, organize and answer questions about it, including looking things up on the web), and that it runs both automatically and when you ask. It does not cover what you type to the assistant, which is sent to answer you whether it is on or off (§2). The companies doing that processing are named on THIS page, which is versioned — so we can change an AI provider or model, for the same processing, by updating this page rather than by switching your photo features off until you re-agree. Your agreement covers the processing, not the vendor.

When would we ask you again? When the category itself widens: a kind of data leaving our servers that the agreement does not name, or a genuinely new purpose. Using your photos to train a model, for advertising, selling data, or showing your content to other users are all outside every agreement this app has ever asked for — any of those would be a fresh, explicit question, never an update to this page. And a new feature that needs more than you agreed to (place features are the example above) asks its own question at that feature's door — it does not switch off what you already use.

Not every change is that kind of change, and we would rather say so than imply a promise we do not keep. On 20 August 2026 we added Open Food Facts to the list above. It receives the barcode digits read from a photo's packaging and sends back the manufacturer's own picture of that product — it never receives a photo of yours. Nothing about where your photos can go became broader, so this page's version moved and you were not asked again.

On 2 November 2026 we removed Open Food Facts from that list. The official details shown after you rate a packaged item now come from our own copy of the product catalogues, which we keep up to date in bulk and not because of anything you do, so no barcode read from your photos is sent to Open Food Facts any more.

On 3 September 2026 we added the shared product index described in §6. Nothing new leaves our servers and no photo is involved; what is new is that the identity of a product, read off its packaging, is kept in a table that is not yours alone. That is a change to what we keep and where, not to where your photos can go — so this page's version moved and you were not asked again.

On 18 September 2026 we added Google to the list above, and unlike the two changes before it, this one does change where your photos can go. Google now reads the same downscaled copy of a photo that Anthropic does, for the same jobs — suggesting tags, checking whether you have tried something, straightening a tilted shot — and was asked first, with Anthropic answering when it could not (until 22 September; see below). What leaves our servers and why it leaves are both unchanged, which is the rule above, so this page's version moved and you were not asked again. We use Google's paid service, whose terms do not let Google use what we send to improve its products.

On 20 September 2026 this page stopped saying that there is no sharing in Favemark, because that had stopped being true the morning before: the shared assistant link described in §6 went live on 19 September, and until this revision this page said nobody could see anything of yours while a link could show a guest your rated notes in one category. That is the kind of gap this page exists to close, and we would rather record it than tidy it away. The rule above holds: a guest's question goes to a company already named here, with text of yours that already goes there, for the same purpose — what is new is that a stranger can ask, and only through a link you chose to create. Creating the link is the question, asked at the moment you do it; so this page's version moved and you were not asked again.

On 21 September 2026 we checked every kind of record the service keeps against this page, and found eleven that §1 had never named: your saved assistant conversations, your reactions and reports, the Recent list, shelf-scan records, undo snapshots, the removal record that follows a deleted file, the connector token, video you attach, the Latin-script spellings of your labels, and the per-day count of guests' questions. None of them was new — the app had kept each since the feature it belongs to shipped — and none leaves our servers. What was wrong was this page, and it is now checked against the database schema by a test, so the next kind of record cannot ship unnamed. Nothing about where your photos can go changed, so this page's version moved and you were not asked again.

On 23 September 2026 this page stopped saying that Anthropic answers when Google cannot, because since 22 September it does not. Suggesting tags, checking whether you have tried something and straightening a tilted shot now go to one company at a time — Google, unless we switch those jobs to Anthropic — and if Google cannot answer, your photo is not passed on to Anthropic instead. For about a day this page described a hand-over that no longer happened, so for these jobs it named more places your photos could go than there were, never fewer. The change narrows where your photos can go rather than widening it, so this page's version moved and you were not asked again.

On 24 September 2026 we removed Voyage AI from the list above, because it no longer receives anything. It used to turn your photos, and some tag labels, into the numeric fingerprint that makes “find similar” work. Google now does that job, from the same downscaled copy of a photo it already reads for suggesting tags, and unlike those jobs it stays with Google even if we switch them to Anthropic. Google was already named here for “find similar” and already received your category labels, so no company gained a new kind of data or a new purpose, and one company stopped receiving anything. That is the rule above, so this page's version moved and you were not asked again.

On 10 October 2026 we added OpenAI to the list above, for one job: the Level button. When you tap Level, the same downscaled copy of the photo that Google reads for tags now goes to OpenAI, whose model straightened photos most accurately when we measured it, and to nobody else. Straightening a tilted shot was already a purpose this page named, and what leaves our servers for it is unchanged, so this page's version moved and you were not asked again. If we switch it off, the Level button goes back to Google.

On 12 October 2026 OpenAI took on one more job: turning a sideways photo the right way up. When a new capture is tagged, four downscaled copies of it — as taken, and turned a quarter, a half and three quarters — go to OpenAI once, and the turn it reads is applied for you, with no tap. A photo you have already turned or edited, or one fetched from the web, is never sent, and you can still turn any photo yourself from the note. Straightening photos was already what this page named OpenAI for, so this page's version moved and you were not asked again.

On 17 October 2026 OpenAI became the backup for reading a photo to identify the item and suggest its tags. When Google's reader is unavailable — it could not be reached, ran out of time or failed on its side — that one read is asked of OpenAI once, in Google's place, with what Google would have received: the same downscaled copy of the photo, your category labels, the name of an item you picked and where on the photo you pointed. It is never asked because of what Google answered, and if OpenAI cannot answer either, the photo goes nowhere else. Reading your photos to identify items was already a purpose this page named, and OpenAI was already named here for reading photos, so this page's version moved and you were not asked again.

On 21 October 2026 we corrected three statements on this page that had stopped being true. §4 now names the continuous, encrypted archive of the database that we have kept at AWS since 28 September 2026, and where AWS keeps it. §5 said something you delete could survive in our backups for roughly two weeks; in that archive it can survive for about four. And §4 said your password worked on our working copies of the database: since 5 October 2026 those copies have been anonymised before they arrive, so it does not. Nothing about which companies process your data, or why, changed, so this page's version moved and you were not asked again.

One correction, for the record. The 23 August 2026 revision of this page said we had asked everyone to agree again, after the automatic lookup in §2 outgrew wording that had been tied to you asking. That re-ask was queued but never reached anyone's device, and on 26 August 2026 we replaced it with the category-based agreement described above — which covers the automatic lookup outright instead of re-asking you about a condition we should never have promised. Nobody's photo features were switched off, and nothing about where your photos can go widened between those two texts.

10. Contact

Questions, corrections, or a deletion request from someone who no longer has the app installed (in the app it is Settings → Account → Delete account): privacy@favemark.app.

Reporting a picture we fetched. Some notes carry a manufacturer's product photo — pulled either from Open Food Facts, where contributors publish them under a licence that asks for credit, or, since 23 August 2026, from the maker's own website, where we hold no licence at all. Since 3 November 2026 it can also be our own copy of the front photo a brand's owner published on Open Food Facts, copied in bulk ahead of any user, with its uploader's credit and its CC BY-SA 3.0 licence. Each is shown only to the person whose note it is, is stored with the page it came from and whatever credit that page carries, and is labelled in the app as not your own photo.

If you hold rights in such a picture and want it removed, write to the address above with the product or the page it came from. These images are derived and disposable, so removing one is a delete on our side and nothing else is lost. A disputed copy of a brand owner's photo is removed for everyone at once: every note that shows it falls back to its own photo. We can also switch the maker's-website step off outright, for everyone, without a release — so a request about a whole catalogue does not have to be answered one picture at a time.

11. People in your photos